Thursday, December 18, 2025

Composting Toilet

 

Mark Bolton markawbolton@gmail.com

11:31 AM (0 minutes ago)



to me

Camp Toilet — Feasibility Notes (Condensed)


Baseline

  • Existing composting toilet works: cheap plastic bin (~$16) for solids, standard toilet seat on top, sawdust/leaf litter.

  • Main deficiency: no urine separation → wet solids, smells, frequent emptying, awkward for women.


Objective

  • Add a urine-diverting insert under a normal toilet seat.

  • Keep everything else crude, cheap, and familiar.

  • One new part only.


Design approach

  • Standard toilet seat (comfort, ergonomics solved).

  • Plastic bin for solids.

  • Urine diverted to a jerry can via a formed insert.

  • Vent optional but desirable.


Materials

  • PETG sheet for the urine-diverting insert (vacuum-formed).

  • ABS / HIPS acceptable alternatives.

  • Cheap ply for mould (scrounged packing ply is ideal).

  • Polyester body filler (“bog”) for fairing.

  • Epoxy or polyurethane for sealing mould surface.


Manufacturing method

  • Vacuum forming of PETG over a reusable mould.

  • Once mould exists, producing multiples is trivial.


Mould construction

  • Build mould by stack-laminating CNC-cut slices:

    • Generate rib profiles in Fusion 360.

    • Cut on flatbed CNC.

    • Dowel-align, glue, sand.

    • Fair with filler, seal, smooth, wax/PVA.

  • Shed-appropriate, repeatable, low cost.


Geometry (critical point)

  • Do not invent the urine-diverter shape.

  • Copy a proven design:

    • Buy/borrow a commercial urine-diverting insert and replicate geometry.

    • Or obtain an STL and adapt it.

    • Physical prototyping acceptable, but correctness beats originality.


CAD role

  • CAD is only for:

    • Cleaning up an existing shape.

    • Generating slice profiles for CNC.

  • Geometry acquisition is the real work.


Men’s Shed outcome

  • One-off effort to make mould.

  • Build time ≈ 30 minutes per unit.

  • Material cost minimal.

  • Mould can be donated to Shed; project scales easily.


Conclusion

  • Project is viable and worthwhile if geometry is copied.

  • Everything else is straightforward fabrication.


No comments:

Post a Comment